Adirondack Lakes Survey Corporation
  • ALTM Data
  • Whiteface Mountain Data
  • ALTM Stream Data

1992 – 2010 ALTM Chemistry (zip archive)  « UPDATED THROUGH DECEMBER 2010

1993 – 2010 ALTM Weekly Snowmelt Chemistry (zip archive)  « NEW!

1992 – 2010 ALTM Yearly Averages (zip archive)   « UPDATED THROUGH DECEMBER 2010

ALTM Sample location coordinates (zip archive)

Whiteface Mountain chemistry and sample associated meteorological data:
2001 – 2006 Whiteface Mountain cloud monitoring chemistry and meteorological data (zip archive)
This zip archive contains seven Microsoft Excel workbooks and one Microsoft Word document that contain Whiteface Mountain cloud chemistry, Whiteface Mountain meteorological data and associated metadata. Approximate zip file size is 2Mb.

2007 & 2008 Whiteface Mountain cloud monitoring chemistry and sample associated meteorological data (zip archive)
This zip archive contains two Microsoft Excel workbooks that contain Whiteface Mountain cloud chemistry, Whiteface Mountain sample associated meteorological data and associated metadata. Approximate zip file size is 619Kb.

2009 Whiteface Mountain cloud monitoring chemistry and sample associated meteorological data (zip archive)
This zip archive contains one Microsoft Excel workbook that contains Whiteface Mountain cloud chemistry, Whiteface Mountain sample associated meteorological data and associated metadata. Approximate zip file size is 3.3Mb. Revised.


Whiteface Mountain complete sampling season meteorological data:
2007 & 2008 Whiteface Mountain complete sample season meteorological data (zip archive)
This zip archive contains two Microsoft Excel workbooks that contain meteorological data and associated metadata for the complete sampling seasons of 2007 and 2008. Approximate zip file size is 322Kb.

2009 Whiteface Mountain complete sample season meteorological data (zip archive)
This zip archive contains one Microsoft Excel workbook that contains meteorological data and associated metadata for the complete sampling season of 2009. Approximate zip file size is 300Kb.

Use of Stream Chemistry for Monitoring Acidic Deposition Effects in the Adirondack Region of New York

Gregory B. Lawrence, Bahram Momen, and Karen M. Roy

Abstract

(abbreviated) Acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) and pH were analyzed on a weekly basis from water samples taken from three streams in the southwest Adirondacks. These data were used to test whether trends in stream chemistry might be related to changes in acidic deposition.
Analysis reveals ANC and pH increased in all three streams from 1991 through 2001. However, both were highly correlated with flow. With flow variation removed, each stream exhibited unique ANC and pH patterns. Unadjusted ANC measurements at Buck Creek, an acidified system, showed an improvement of 1.5 µeq/yr. After adjustment for flow however, no trend is evident in ANC for the decade.
  • 1992 – 2004 Stream Chemistry (zip archive) – Download contains data for Bald Mountain Brook (BMB), Fly Pond Outlet (FPO), and Buck Creek (BCK)).
  • View location Map
  • Printer friendly PDF of the Journal of Environmental Quality article.
  • Note: Adobe® Reader® is required to view this article. Visit www.adobe.com to get the latest version.

2005 – 2009 Stream Chemistry – Seasonal Medians (zip archive)

  • ALS Historic Pond Data Selector
  • 1984-1987 ALS Data
Data Selector — click here to return to selector
Please select the Pond or area of interest from any one of the drop-down lists below
Pond Name--
County--
Town--
Pond #--
Your selection will open in the tab below.
Selection Results — selection opens in new window

1984 – 1987 ALS Summer Surface Chemistry — historic (zip archive)

1984 – 1987 ALS Summer Surface Chemistry References — historic (zip archive) This zip archive contains eight companion references for the 1984 – 1987 Summer Surface Chemistry. The approximate size is 55Mb. The reference files in this download, as well as the 1984-1987 ALS Summer Surface Chemistry files, can also be obtained on CD upon request. The address to request a copy is found at the bottom of this webpage.

  • ALTM Compendium
  • Acid Rain in the Adirondacks
  • 1990 ALS Report - Executive Summary
  • Other Publications

The Adirondack Long–Term Monitoring Lakes:
A Compendium of Site Descriptions, Recent Chemistry and Selected Research Information

Abstract

The Adirondack Lakes Survey Corporation (ALSC) and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) have compiled a compendium of site descriptions, recent lake chemistry, and selected research information of the fifty-two Adirondack Long Term Monitoring (ALTM) waters. This compilation is distributed free to the public on CDROM and via the web at www.adirondacklakessurvey.org in Adobe PDF format. For each of the fifty-two lakes sampled, descriptions of the geomorphology, recent chemistry, results of historical and recent aquatic biota and fish surveys, intensive studies and research programs, and watershed and land/ cover use overviews are provided in an easy-to-use desk reference format. The work is organized by watershed and supplemented with maps and tables that complete the overview for each ALTM water. This work was designed to offer the public, researchers and policy makers an easy reference to the current research and chemistry at the diverse sites represented by the ALTM across the Adirondack Park.

Note: Adobe® Reader® is required to view this report. Visit www.adobe.com to get the latest version.

Acid Rain and the Adirondacks: A Research Summary


  • Click on a link to view a chapter (link opens in new window).
  • To download, right-click on a link and click "save target as...".
  • Adobe® Reader® is required to view this report. Visit www.adobe.com to get the latest version.
  • Load time may vary according to your internet connection speed.
  • To obtain a full version of this report on compact disk, contact the ALSC (address at bottom of page).

COVER AND CONTENTS (194KB)

PREFACE (345KB)

CHAPTER 1 (4.2MB)

CHAPTER 2 (1.9MB)

CHAPTER 3 (5.12MB)

CHAPTER 4 (2.9MB)

CHAPTER 5 (1.8MB)

CHAPTER 6 (12.4MB)

CHAPTER 7 (5.3MB)

CHAPTER 8 (667KB)

CHAPTER 9 (3.75MB)

CHAPTER 10 (1.9MB)

BIBLIOGRAPHY AND INDEX (2.4MB)

1990 Interpretive Report - Executive Summary

Print friendly version

Adirondack Lakes Study:
An Interpretive Analysis of Fish Communities and Water Chemistry (1984-1987)

INTRODUCTION

The Adirondacks is a large, forested upland and mountainous region in northern New York. The majority of surface waters in the region are dilute, with low levels of acid neutralizing capacity (ANC). At the same time, the region receives relatively large inputs of precipitation (100-150 cm annually) and acidic deposition (e.g., typical pH is about 4.1 to 4.2). As a result, much of the debate regarding the effects of acidic deposition on aquatic ecosystems has focused on the Adirondacks.

The Adirondack Lakes Survey Corporation (ALSC) was formed as a cooperative effort of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation (ESEERCO) to better characterize the chemical and biological status of Adirondack lakes. Between 1984 and 1987, the ALSC surveyed 1469 lakes within the Adirondack ecological zone (Figure 1). This unique cooperative effort resulted in the acquisition of an unparalleled, extensive physical, chemical and biological data base on 52% of the ponded waters in the Adirondack region. The results from this survey are described in the ALSC summary report, Adirondack Lakes Study 1984-1987: An Evaluation of Fish Communities and Water Chemistry.

As a follow up to the survey, the ALSC sponsored a series of interpretive analyses of the ALSC data base. The primary objectives of these analyses were as follows:

  • evaluate the influence of mineral acids (e.g., from acidic deposition) and nonmineral acids (e.g., natural organic acids) on lake pH levels

  • classify Adirondack lakes according to lake and watershed features expected to influence their responsiveness to changes in acidic deposition

  • evaluate the sensitivity of Adirondack lakes to changes in environmental conditions, such as changes in mineral acids or dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations

  • identify lake characteristics important in explaining the observed present-day status of fish communities in Adirondack lakes, in particular, the relative importance of lake acidity

  • evaluate changes that have occurred over time in Adirondack fish communities and probable causes for these trends by using the available historical data on fish communities in the Adirondacks and the ALSC data base

  • determine the degree to which the existing fish resource might be at risk from continued acidic deposition or might recover if acidity levels were reduced

The basic approach examined relationships observed in the ALSC data base among watershed characteristics, lake chemistry and fish status. These analyses built upon the understanding of important processes influencing lake chemistry and fish communities derived from earlier, mechanistic research projects in the Adirondacks, such as the Integrated Lake/Watershed Acidification Study (ILWAS) and the Regional Integrated Lake/Watershed Acidifications Study (RILWAS). Key advantages of the ALSC data base include its size, which allows for in-depth analyses for particular lake types of data subsets and the associated regional perspective provided by the survey.

SURFACE WATER CHEMISTRY

Lakes with low pH and low ANC are prevalent in the Adirondacks. For example, 26% of the waters surveyed by the ALSC had air-equilibrated pH <5.0, representing 8% of the lake surface area. Negative ANC values (indicating the occurrence of strong acids in the system) were measured in 26% of the lakes sampled, 11% of the lake area. Waters with low pH and ANC were found throughout the region, but were concentrated in the western and southwestern Adirondacks, in particular in the Oswegatchie-Black and Mohawk-Hudson watersheds (see Figure 1). This area is characterized by large numbers of small, high elevation lakes and receives the highest levels of precipitation in the region.

Influence of Mineral Acids

Acid neutralizing capacity is a measure of the net strong base in solution, or net strong acid if its value is negative. As a result, additions of strong acids or bases to surface waters have a direct effect on ANC. Depending on the initial ANC of the solution, this addition may also significantly influence pH.

Sulfate is the dominant mineral acid anion in ALSC lakes, indicating that sulfuric acid is the major source of mineral acidity. Some portion of this sulfate is attributable to acidic deposition. In the absence of all modifying processes other than evaporation, current levels of sulfate deposition in the Adirondacks would produce concentrations of sulfate from about 100 to 150 µeq L-1 in surface waters. Most drainage lakes (that is, lakes with an outlet) in the Adirondacks have sulfate concentrations between about 80 and 140 µeq L-1. The retention of sulfate in Adirondack soils is minimal and thus, sulfate retention would have little effect on lake sulfate concentrations. In-lake and wetlands processes, however, may modify sulfate concentrations substantially, especially in systems with longer water residence times. Seepage systems (lakes with no outlet), for example, even with more evaporation, commonly have sulfate concentrations that are about 40 µeq L-1 lower than those in drainage lakes, most likely as a result of in-lake processes.

In contrast to sulfate, nitrate and chloride concentrations measured by the ALSC were generally low (except for chloride concentrations in lakes impacted by road salt). Other studies, however, have shown that higher concentrations of nitrate occur during hydrologic events, such as snowmelt and result in periodic decreases in ANC and pH.

The relative contributions of mineral and nonmineral acids to hydrogen ion (H+) concentration in Adirondack lakes with low pH were estimated based on the concentrations of mineral acid anions, base cations and DOC as measured by the ALSC. Of the 256 drainage lakes sampled by the ALSC with pH ≤5.0, mineral acids were estimated to support more than half the H+ present in 48% of the lakes, and over 90% of the H+ present in 83 (32%) of these lakes. In seepage lakes, on the other hand, mineral acids are apparently less important. Of the 92 seepage lakes sampled by the ALSC with pH ≤5.0, mineral acids were estimated to support more than half of the H+ present in 33% of the samples and over 90% of H+ in 13% of these lakes.

Influence of Non-mineral Acids

Other important acid-base systems in Adirondack waters include organic acids (products of the decay of plant and animal matter) and carbon dioxide. These acids can have a significant effect on lake pH levels. Results from the ALSC survey indicate that volatile acids (largely carbon dioxide) have the greatest effect on pH levels in waters with ANC > 50 µeq L-1, depressing the lake pH by 0.3 to 1 pH units below the levels expected for air equilibration. Nonvolatile acids (primarily organic acids) have the greatest effect on pH levels in waters with ANC between about zero and 50 µeq L-1, where pH depressions attributed to organic acids range from about 0.5 to 2.5 pH units.

In the past, organic acids were generally thought to act as weak acids capable of decreasing pH but not ANC. The ALSC data, however, indicate that in Adirondack waters dissolved organics also have strong acid components, as evidenced by the strong relationship between DOC and the anion deficit (i.e., the charge imbalance) in lakes with very high H+ concentrations (pH 4.0-4.5). Analysis of the ALSC data shows that organic acids contribute 4.5-5.0 µeq L-1 of strong acid to solution per milligram of DOC. The implication of this finding is most important. As a result of their strong acid component, organic acids, by themselves, can produce negative values for ANC. Thus, the common assumption that negative ANC values are necessarily indicative of acidification from mineral acids is incorrect. These observations were based on empirical data collected during extensive field investigations and no confirming laboratory experiments were conducted.

Finally, as a corollary to the statements regarding the importance of mineral acids, organic acids were estimated to support more than half the H+ present in 52% of the drainage lakes sampled with pH ≤5.0, and over 90% of the H+ in 41% of these lakes. In seepage lakes with pH ≤5.0, organic acids were estimated to support more than half of the H+ present in 67% of the 92 lakes sampled and more than 90% in 43% of these lakes.

Lake Classification

The acid-base status of surface waters is ultimately a function of the relative contributions of acids and bases. These acids are derived from both atmospheric deposition and natural processes, such as organic matter decay and the oxidation of organic nitrogen. The bases result from reactions occurring within the watershed soils (e.g., weathering and cation exchange reactions) and from atmospheric deposition. The degree to which the incoming precipitation interacts with the watershed soils and the routing of the water through these soils, are major determinants of the base supply rate. In watersheds with thick soils, acids - whether natural or from acidic deposition - will be largely neutralized by bases within the soils. In contrast, in watersheds with thin soils, much of the incoming precipitation passes only through the shallow organic horizons and into the lakes and streams. Such systems would generally be expected to be more responsive to increases or decreases in atmospheric acid inputs. Some seepage lakes, in particular "mounded" seepage lakes that are separated by relatively impermeable soil layers from the groundwater system, receive almost all of their water as direct precipitation, with little to no interaction with the soil. Mounded seepage lakes, might be expected to be quite responsive to changes in atmospheric inputs.

A classification scheme was developed to group the ALSC lakes according to these influential watershed features based on their chemical and hydrological characteristics measured during the ALSC survey. Thirty-nine percent of the lakes classified fell within the four classes expected to have the smallest amount of neutralization by the watershed: (1) mounded seepage lakes with low levels of DOC (3%); (2) mounded seepage lakes with high DOCs (3%); (3) drainage lakes in watersheds with thin till and with low DOC (19%); and (4) drainage lakes in thin-tilled watersheds with high DOC (14%).

Predicted Changes in pH

One of the objectives of the analysis of the ALSC water chemistry data was to determine how the H+ concentration (or pH) might change in response to changes in mineral acid inputs of DOC. Because of the large size of the ALSC data base, it was possible to conduct these sensitivity analyses based solely on the ALSC data.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Direct/Delayed Response Project (DDRP) involved the application of three dynamic simulation models to predict changes in ANC as a result of a 30% decrease in atmospheric deposition. All three models predicted increases of about 5 to 15 µeq L-1 for Adirondack lakes. Analyses were conducted, to determine the response of selected representative ALSC lakes from the four lowest ANC classes (high-and low-DOC thin-tilled drainage lakes and high-and low-DOC mounded seepage lakes) to a 15 µeq L-1 increase in ANC. The predicted increases in pH, assuming no change in DOC, ranged from 0.17 to 0.38 pH units. If increases in DOC occur simultaneously, as a limited number of field observations indicate, the changes in pH would be smaller. For example, an increase in DOC of about 2-4 mg L-1 would be sufficient to entirely offset the increase in pH resulting from the 15 µeq L-1 increase in ANC. Whether or not a DOC increase might occur in the Adirondacks with a decrease in deposition is not known. Some additional research is needed to answer this question.

FISH COMMUNITIES

Fish were caught in 76% of the lakes surveyed by the ALSC. No fish were caught in 24%, representing 7% of the lake area. Lakes with fish occurred throughout the Adirondacks, while fishless lakes were concentrated in the western and southwestern watersheds (Oswegatchie-Black and Mohawk-Hudson). Fifty-three fish species were collected in total. The number of species caught per lake (i.e., species richness) ranged from zero (fishless) to 13, with a median of one species per lake in the Oswegatchie-Black and Mohawk-Hudson watersheds, as compared to median values of 4-5 species per lake in the other three major Adirondack watersheds.

Characteristics of Lakes Without Fish

Lakes without fish have a diversity of characteristics, reflecting the large number of factors that determine the suitability of a lake for fish survival and reproduction. Many of the fishless lakes were small (nearly 70% were <4 ha) and shallow (60% had a mean depth <2m). Fishless lakes were also prevalent at high elevations, no fish were caught in 65% of the lakes surveyed at >600 m. The majority of lakes without fish had relatively low pH and ANC levels: 77% had pH <5.0; 92% had pH <5.5; and 77% had ANC <0 µeq L-1.

The factors responsible for the absence of fish vary among lakes. Forty-six of the lakes surveyed by the ALSC were classified as bogs. No fish were caught in any of these lakes. The absence of fish from bogs probably reflects the combined effects of low concentrations of dissolved oxygen, poor spawning substrate and naturally low pH levels. Of the remaining 300 fishless lakes, 270 had pH levels below 5.5 and may potentially be fishless as a result of high levels of acidity. About half of these lakes (54%) had a high estimated fraction (>50%) of the H+ supported by organics, while the rest had less than half of the H+ supported organics and appear to be dominated instead by mineral acids. Not all of the low pH fishless lakes, would necessarily be able to support fish in the absence of high acidity. For example, 31 of the low pH lakes that were dominated by mineral acids were small (<4 ha) and occurred at elevations above 600 m. Some portion of these small, high elevation lakes would be expected to lack fish regardless of the lake pH (perhaps about 40% based on comparison to similar lakes with pH >5.5 that were fishless) because of low levels of dissolved oxygen during winter, freezing or inaccessibility to fish. Based on these analyses, the estimated number of surveyed waters for which mineral acids (and acidic deposition) appear to be the primary cause for the lake of fish is 100-113, or about 30% of the fishless lakes sampled by the ALSC.

Lake Characteristics Associated with Patterns of Fish Species Distribution

Changes in fish species composition and lower species richness may occur at more moderate environmental conditions than those that result in the total absence of fish from a lake. Factors associated with the presence and absence of selected fish species and with among-lake variations in species richness were examined using bivariate and multivariate regression, both for the Adirondack region as a whole and for individual drainage systems.

As expected, a large number of factors were significantly associated with fish status. For example, stocking, biological variables (e.g., the occurrence of potential predators or competitors), and silica (an index of groundwater inflow) were of particular importance in explaining patterns of brook trout presence/absence. Similar analyses for creek chub identified lake characteristics such as the presence of predators, small lake size, the absence of inlets and outlets, and lower flushing rates as significantly associated with the absence of creek chub. In each analysis, one or more variables related to surface water acid-base chemistry, generally lake pH, was also selected as a significant predictor of the occurrence of brook trout and creek chub. Thus, even after accounting as much as possible for the effects of the many other factors that influence fish, lakes without these fish species had lower pH than did lakes with fish present. Likewise, within individual drainage systems in the western Adirondacks, where low pH lakes are common, all of the fish species and groups of species examined exhibited uniformly lower frequencies of occurrence in waters with lower pH. These results support the conclusion that lake pH (and/or other acidity-related variables) plays an important role in restricting the distribution of fish species from at least some Adirondack lakes that would otherwise be suitable habitat.

In nonacidic lakes, species richness is highly correlated with lake area; larger lakes provide more divers habitat and generally support more fish species. Lakes with higher pH also tend to support more fish species than do lakes with lower pH. The relative effects of lake area and pH on species richness were quantified using a regression model and applying it to selected drainage systems in the western and eastern Adirondacks. In general, lakes in the western Adirondacks support fewer species than do lakes in the eastern Adirondacks. These differences appear to be largely attributable to differences in lake pH. Model applications suggest that the species-impoverished, acidic lakes prevalent in the western Adirondacks have the potential (based on the surface area/species richness relationship) to support more diverse fish communities, comparable to those present in the eastern Adirondacks, if pH levels in these western lakes were to increase significantly. Although other factors (e.g., productivity, access for fish immigration, disturbance) may locally modify the potential species richness for individual lakes, these other variables were not found to be strongly influential on a regional scale.

Historical Changes in Fish Communities

Changes in fish communities over time also provide insight into the potential effects of acid-base chemistry on fish resources. Survey data collected since the late 1920's by the NYSDEC were examined to assess the historical occurrence of fish in lakes sampled by the ALSC and probable causes for observed fish community and population trends.

Only 17 of the lakes that are now fishless were surveyed in the initial statewide biological surveys in 1929-34. At that time, about half of these lakes (9 lakes) had one or more fish species caught or reported to occur. The other half have apparently always been fishless, although it is possible that some lakes lost fish communities prior to these earliest surveys.

Most of the lakes sampled in 1929-34 were larger lakes at lower elevations, which today have relatively high pH. Fish communities in these lakes would be less likely to have been impacted by acidic deposition, compared to Adirondack lakes as a whole. To partially compensate for this bias, historical surveys conducted after 1929-34 but before 1970 were also considered in evaluating fish trends. Unfortunately, many of these surveys were not intended to comprehensively sample the fish community. Trends through time were assessed only for the subset of lakes with confirmed occurrence of a species in the past (i.e., caught in a survey prior to 1970). This expanded data set is also somewhat biased towards larger, lower-elevation lakes with higher pH, but to a lesser degree than for the subset of lakes surveyed in 1929-34. For this reason, results from these analyses provide evidence for fish population losses but are not suitable for regional estimates of the extent of such losses.

All available data, except for information on acid-base chemistry, were reviewed for each lake to identify apparent fish population losses and probable causes for observed losses. The numbers of lakes classified as having lost fish populations apparently as a result of acidification varied between zero (for rainbow trout, brown trout, largemouth bass and northern pike) to 44 (for brook trout, representing 11% of the lakes surveyed by the ALSC in which brook trout were caught prior to 1970). Acid-sensitive minnow species had apparently disappeared as a result of acidification from 19% of the lakes with evidence for historical occurrence; common shiner from 15% of the lakes; creek chub and lake trout from 10%; and white sucker from 6% of the lakes with confirmed historical occurrence. Among species variations in the proportion of fish populations lost are a function of several factors: (1) the sensitivity of the species to acidic waters; (2) the degree to which the species tends to naturally occur in those lakes more susceptible to acidification; and (3) the susceptibility of the species to capture during the historical and ALSC surveys. Of the 858 lakes evaluated for historical trends (i.e., all lakes with at least some historical information), 140 (16%) had lost one or more fish populations apparently as a result of acidification. Lakes considered to have lost fish populations as a result of acidification consistently had lower present-day levels of pH than did lakes still supporting the fish species.

Acidification is not the only factor or necessarily the dominant factor influencing Adirondack fish communities. The numbers of lakes for which fish population losses were attributed to factors other than acidification actually exceeded those for which acidification was rated as the primary cause. Common alternative explanations that could be identified with the available data include lake reclamation with rotenone, changes in stocking policy and the introduction of potential competitors or predators. In contrast to acidification, however, these other factors often affected only some fish species within the fish community (resulting in species replacements rather than a net decline in species richness) or resulted directly from fishery management practices designed to improve fishing opportunities in the region.

Fisheries Resource at Risk

As noted above, lakes classified as mounded seepage lakes or thin-tilled drainage lakes (for both high and low DOC) would be expected to be more responsive to changes in atmospheric inputs of strong acids. Thirty-nine percent of the lakes sampled by the ALSC were classified into these groups. Of the lakes in which the ALSC caught fish, only 27% were mounded seepage or thin-tilled drainage lakes. Twenty-five percent of the lakes with brook trout fall within these two lake classes. Other sport fish species, occur relatively infrequently in these lake classes: 10% of the lakes with lake trout caught by the ALSC; 6% of the lakes with smallmouth bass or largemouth bass; 3% of the lakes with rainbow trout or brown trout; and 3% of the lakes with northern pike. The majority of lakes currently supporting sport fish would appear to be relatively insensitive to further acidification, i.e., they were classified as drainage lakes in watersheds with intermediate or thick till or influenced by carbonate minerals, or as flow-through seepage lakes.

With a reduction in lake acidity, some portion of these lakes would gradually recover fish populations. Quantitative regional analyses of fish recovery were outside of the scope of this project. However, the historical trend analyses provide an index of the types of species likely to be recovered with improvements in water quality. Of the fish populations rated as having been lost apparently as a result of acidification, brook trout accounted for 28%, white sucker for 14%, creek, chub 13%, common shiner 11%, brown bullhead 9%, pumpkinseed 7%, northern redbelly dace 6%, golden shiner 5%, and lake trout, smallmouth bass, yellow perch, and lake whitefish, <5% each. The majority of lakes affected tend to be smaller lakes at higher elevations, which historically supported fairly simple fish communities.

Brook trout is the most important indigenous sport fish in Adirondack waters and was the second most common species caught by the ALSC (occurring in 52% of the lakes with fish present). Anecdotal accounts of brook trout occurrence in the 1800's indicate that the species was also widespread historically. Although native to the Adirondacks, brook trout have been introduced into many waters where they must be currently maintained by stocking because of insufficient spawning substrate. Brook trout typically spawn in tributaries and over areas of groundwater upwelling, and high levels of silica were found to be associated with the potential for self-sustaining brook trout populations. Concentrations of silica measured by the ALSC were used, to estimate the potential for brook trout natural reproduction within waters that currently have low pH (<5.0) and no brook trout. Relatively few of these lakes (10-15%) were classified, based on their silica concentration, as having the potential to support lake-spawning populations of brook trout. Thus, even if acidity levels were reduced, it would appear that under present-day conditions (e.g., of fishing pressure) many of these lakes would require supplement stocking to support brook trout.

Finally, perhaps 50-70% of the lakes that are currently fishless appear to always have been fishless, or are fishless primarily for reasons other than mineral acidity, and would likely remain fishless even with reductions in acidic deposition.

Note: Adobe® Reader® is required to view many of the reports listed. Visit www.adobe.com to get the latest version.

NEW! A Long-Term Monitoring Program for Evaluating Changes in Water Quality in Selected Adirondack Waters: Core Program 2007—2011: Program Summary Report 2010 (External Link - NYSERDA, pdf)

A Long-Term Monitoring Program for Evaluating Changes in Water Quality in Selected Adirondack Waters: Data Summary Report 2009 (External Link - NYSERDA, pdf)

NEW! Acid Rain and Related Programs: 2009 Highlights : 15 Years of Results | 1995 to 2009
(External Link - USEPA Clean Air Markets)

Threats From Above: Air Pollution Impacts on Ecosystems and Biological Diversity in the Eastern United States, Lovett, G.M., and T.H. Tear. 2008, The Nature Conservancy and the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies. (PDF, 1.2MB)

Forever Wild: Protecting the Adirondacks From Acid Deposition, Milford, J., and P. Middleton. 2008, Environmental Defense Fund. (PDF, 366KB)

Results from the 2003-2005 Western Adirondack Stream Survey, Lawrence, G. B., Baldigo, B. P., Roy, K. M., Simonin, H. A., Bode, R. W., Passy, S. I., and Capone, S. B. 08-22. 2008. NYSERDA. (PDF, 1.52MB)

Probabilistic relationship between liquid water content and ion concentrations in cloud water
(External Link - subscription/registration may be required)
Source: Atmospheric Research, Author(s): Nenad Aleksic, James E., Dukett
Abstract: Publication year: 2010
Within non-precipitating clouds, total ionic content (TIC) of cloud droplets decreases with increasing liquid water content (LWC). However, this is not a simple inverse relationship. Instead, TIC has an exponential distribution with a parameter that is dependent on LWC. We demonstrate this finding using a long term monitoring record (1994 to 2006) of cloud water chemistry measurements collected at the summit of Whiteface Mountain, NY.
PubDate: 2010-08-11T19:55:02Z

NEW! Progress toward clean cloud water at Whiteface Mountain New York
(External Link - subscription/registration may be required)
Source: Atmospheric Environment, Author(s): James E. Dukett, Nenad Aleksic, et al
Abstract: Publication year: 2011
Fossil fuel combustion is the primary source of anthropogenic acidity in cloud water. Since 1994 there is a measurable decrease in hydrogen, sulfate, and nitrate ion concentrations in cloud water collected at Whiteface Mountain. In this paper we assess these changes from the point of view of progress toward clean air conditions.
PubDate(online): Sept. 10, 2011
  • ALTM Program Information
  • ALTM Site Location Map
  • ALTM Lake Classification

Long Term Monitoring Program

Print friendly version

The Adirondack region of northern New York State is located directly downwind from major midwest coal-burning sources. Power generating facilities in the Midwest emit sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, which are the major precursors of acid rain causing the acidification of many Adirondack lakes and ponds. Certain geologic and soil characteristics including elevated terrain, thin shallow soils and impermeable bedrock combined with high amounts of rainfall make this region one of the most sensitive to acidification in North America. Consequently, this region is a focal point for numerous scientific research efforts designed to identify the processes involved in acidification and to evaluate its effect on aquatic resources as well as the effectiveness of emissions controls.

The results of research conducted by the Adirondack Lakes Survey Corporation (ALSC) from 1984-1987 indicated that nearly twenty five percent of the waters had pH values of 5.0 or less and that forty eight percent of the waters had little or no buffering capacity ANC≤40µeq/L) or were extremely sensitive to further acidification. In 1992, following the enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, the ALSC initiated a long-term chemical monitoring project involving 52 waters representative of the different classes of waters found in the Adirondack region.

This Long-Term Monitoring Program is currently being sponsored by the New York State Energy Research Development Authority (NYSERDA), NYSDEC and the USEPA. This unique network of support allows this critical long-term record to continue uninterrupted.

Catagorization of major types of lakes. Graphic representation of how ALS lakes are divided into lake classifications.

ALSC Lake Classification System

Print friendly version

Adirondack lakes fall into two major groups: seepage lakes and drainage lakes. Drainage lakes have an outlet, while seepage lakes do not. Both lake types receive water from various sources including surface runoff, groundwater, and direct precipitation, although in different relative amounts. Drainage lakes receive a higher proportion of water from surface runoff, whereas seepage lakes receive water primarily from direct precipitation and groundwater. Mounded seepage lakes are perched above the water table and receive most of their water input from direct precipitation Because of that, they are potentially good indicators of change in atmospheric deposition.

The lake selection process for the Long-Term Monitoring project was based on the results of earlier ALSC studies (1984-1988) and a lake classification system developed by Newton and Driscoll (1990). The seven major categories include; mounded and flow through seepage lakes; thin, medium, and thick till drainage lakes; carbonate influenced lakes; and salt impacted lakes. Salt impacted lakes, which typically are found near major roadways, were not considered for inclusion in the LTM study. The focus of the LTM project is on lakes that fall into the thin till, mounded seepage, medium till categories. These categories contain most of the lakes that are of interest for long-term monitoring because they represent the majority of lakes that are acidic (pH 5.0 or ANC ≤ 0.0µeq/L) lakes and lakes potentially vulnerable to episodic acidification (ANC ≤ 40.0µeq/L).

A total of 52 lakes were selected in 1992 representing six of the seven major lake categories, mostly from the ALSC (1984-1988) data set. In order to maintain continuity with earlier studies, seventeen ALTM (Adirondack Long Term Monitoring Study - Syracuse University) and several USEPA ELS (Eastern Lake Survey) were included. Within the three primary lake classes (thin till, medium till, and mounded seepage), waters were selected based on surface area, elevation, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) values as wells as logistical and operational limitations in order that a representative sample of Adirondack lakes be realistically sampled.

ALTM Lake Class Tableopens new window

Lake Type Illustrationclick here or on image to enlarge/shrink

Lake Class Diagramclick here or on image to enlarge/shrink



  • ALS Overview
  • ALS Study 1984—1987

ALS Overview

Print friendly version

During the early 1980's, there were projections of widespread destruction of lakes in the Adirondack region of New York State as a result of acidic precipitation. Although the Department of Environmental Conservation gathered data since 1977 on waters believed to be sensitive to acidification, a review of the chemistry and biology of these lakes provided an incomplete picture of past and existing conditions. It was clear that a more standardized, detailed and comprehensive survey was needed to examine the extent and magnitude of acidification of waters in New York State. In 1983, the Adirondack Lakes Survey Corporation, a NYS §401 not-for-profit corporation, was established to gather baseline information required to monitor environmental changes and provide a basis for policy decisions with regard to pollutants.

From 1984 to 1987, field investigators focused on the collection of detailed chemical, physical and biological data from 1469 Adirondack lakes and ponds ranging in size from about 0.5 to 700 acres. These data showed that 352 waters had pH values of 5.0 or less. Fish were not captured in 346 of the waters surveyed. The majority of acidified waters and those waters without fish captured were located in the western and southwestern Adirondack region. Waters in which fish were not captured were typically small (<10 acres), shallow (mean depth <10 feet) and located at high elevation (>2000 feet). Fishless waters were characterized as having low pH (<5.0), low acid neutralizing capacity (<0.0 µeq/L), low calcium concentrations and high aluminum values.

In 1989, the ALSC assembled a team of international experts to examine and interpret data for the four-year survey. In 1990, a report entitled, Adirondack Lakes Survey: An Interpretive Analysis of Fish Communities and Water Chemistry 1984-87 was released. Information from this report has been cited extensively in acidic precipitation research literature both nationally and internationally. Relating acidification, atmospheric deposition and fishless lakes was not a simple matter. The experts reported mineral acidification from atmospheric deposition was responsible for ecosystem damage, including loss of fish populations. Natural acidification, oxygen limitations and winter ice conditions were also suggested as possible causal agents responsible for fishless waters. However, a significant number of lakes without fish were considered fishless due to mineral acidification.

One of the major benefits of this study was the development of a classification system based on watershed and water quality parameters. The classification system facilitates lake and pond selection for future research and the ability to predict responses of waters to further acidification or to reductions in atmospheric deposition of pollutants.

In 1988, the ALSC developed a proposal at the request of the United State Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to assist in a regional program to assess the impacts of episodic acidification on chemistry and fish communities in headwater streams as a result of storms and spring snowmelt. Intensive field studies were conducted for a period of two years in three specific areas of the Northeastern U.S. including Southwestern Pennsylvania, the Catskills and the Adirondacks. The ALSC contribution to this regional effort was the study of four headwater Adirondack streams located within a ten mile radius of the village of Eagle Bay. Stream chemistry parameters including pH, conductivity and temperature were continuously monitored. Automatic samplers were programmed to collect water samples at scheduled intervals during storm events and the spring snowmelt period. Samples were analyzed for 20 parameters to determine the duration and magnitude of chemical changes during specific events. ALSC personnel conducted intensive biological studies that included assessment of fish movement patterns using upstream/downstream fish traps and radio tagging of individual fish, periodic fish populations assessments and in-stream bioassays. The results of this project showed that it is difficult to isolate and quantify effects of episodic acidification. However, it is clear that the occurrence of certain events such as the spring snowmelt can result in major chemical changes that cause significant biological impacts. In streams where pH values were depressed to below 5.0 for more than several days during the snowmelt period, caged brook trout and blacknose dace experienced high mortality rates. In general, headwater Adirondack streams that are poorly buffered and experience episodic acidification have fewer fish and fewer species of acid-sensitive fish compared with streams that are adequately buffered and maintain pH above 5.0 during storm or snowmelt events. Since many of the headwater streams located in the acid-sensitive area of the Adirondacks are poorly buffered, episodic acidification may be responsible for reducing and, in some cases, eliminating many of these stream fish populations.

In 1991, the ALSC Trace Metals Study was initiated in an effort to quantify 38 elements in samples of the ambient atmosphere for a two-year period at five sites in New York State. Samples of wet deposition were also collected at two of the sites to characterize elements and ions in precipitation. ALSC and NYSDEC personnel collected samples and sent them to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for analyses. The results of this research were summarized in a report that includes average concentrations of elements found in the atmosphere and higher concentrations from pollutants transported over long distances into the state from a variety of sources and regions. The data from this project were used to predict the human health risk attributed to exposure to ambient and elevated concentrations of pollutants. The mercury data collected were used to answer questions about mercury cycling through terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

In 1991, the ALSC developed a proposal to conduct a long-term monitoring program (LTM) for evaluating changes in water chemistry in a selected set of representative Adirondack waters. This project, funded by USEPA and others, began in the spring of 1992. The primary goal of this project was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) which mandated significant reductions in sulfer dioxide (SO2) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx), pollutants that are responsible for acidic deposition. Research produced ongoing detailed assessment of temporal and spatial chemistry of waters located in the Adirondack region.

Adirondack Lakes Survey: An Evaluation of Fish Communities and Water Chemistry

Print friendly version

Comprehensive physical, biological and chemical surveys were conducted on 1469 waters located in the Adirondack ecological zone between 1984 and 1987 using standardized procedures. The primary objective of these efforts was to provide an accurate up-to-date database that would establish a basis for assessing future environmental impacts and associated trends and provide scientific data for making fisheries management decisions. In order to survey lakes that were representative of the region, waters were selected using a modified random selection process that excluded lakes exceeding 500 acres in size but included lakes and ponds in all size and elevation classes. Survey efforts were conducted from ice-out to ice-in and involved three distinct field operations. From April through June, field crews focused on conducting surveys on remotely located waters that were mostly accessed by helicopter. During July and August of each year, detailed lake water chemistry data was collected. From September until ice-in, biological survey efforts focused on waters that were relatively easy to access.

The results of this comprehensive research effort were statistically described in the report: Adirondack Lakes Study 1984-1987: An Evaluation of Fish Communities and Water Chemistry. The extensive data collected from these surveys are maintained in the ALS data base. This web site is a limited version of the total data base for these surveys. Three categories of information are provided through the ALS Historic Pond Data page; baseline chemistry, location and fish species. Users can enter what pond or location information they know and will then be linked to a table that contains data that matches their query.

  • About ALSC
  • ALSC Mission Statement

About ALSC:

The Adirondack Region of New York is sensitive to acidic deposition due to its geography, the low acid neutralizing capacity of its lakes and streams, and the relatively large amounts of annual rainfall it receives. As a result, there is an intensive research interest in the effects of acidic deposition on aquatic ecosystems within the Adirondacks.

The Adirondack Lakes Survey Corporation (ALSC) is a 501c3 not-for-profit corporation formed to better characterize the chemical and biological status of Adirondack lakes. The ALSC has collected, analyzed, prepared data, and worked with the scientific community for over 25 years on projects related to monitoring the conditions in the natural ecosystems of the Adirondack Park and New York State. The data collected and analyzed by the ALSC has been, and continues to be, utilized as one of the major sources for the development of both State and Federal policies on emission control and air transport regulations. Sampling, chemistry analysis, and data products include water, fish, snow, and cloud collections on acid deposition and climate change research projects.

In the mid 1980s, the ALSC surveyed 1469 lakes within the Adirondacks. This effort resulted in an extensive and unique database of the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of over half the lakes within the region. The results can be found on this site and are described in the report, Adirondack Lakes Study 1984-1987: An Evaluation of Fish Communities and Water Chemistry. Since that time, monitoring of acid rain, fisheries and watershed projects continue. The most intensive of these is the Long-Term Monitoring Project  which began in 1992.

ALSC Mission Statement:

The mission of the Adirondack Lakes Survey Corporation is to monitor changes to natural ecosystems of the Adirondack Mountain ecological zone with a focus on water quality, atmospheric deposition, fish surveys, and other biological and chemical studies for the benefit of regulatory agencies and the general public. Its mission is accomplished by working with New York State, federal agencies, other agencies and the general public through an exchange of objective information.

  • Contact Information
  • Employment Opportunities
  • Feedback

Adirondack Lakes Survey Corporation

1115 NYS Rt.86, P.O. BOX 296
Ray Brook, NY 12977
Voice: 518·897·1354
Fax: 518·897·1364
info@adirondacklakessurvey.org

No employment opportunities at this time.

Your Name:
A value is required.
Your Email:
A value is required.Invalid format.


Attention:
To make sure your comment is recieved,
please select 'Web Comments' from the list below


Mail Message:
A value is required.


panel 9
ALSC recieves funding from:
NYSERDA LOGO New York State Energy Research & Development Authority DEC LOGO New York State Department of Environmental Conservation EPA LOGO U.S. Environmental Protection Agency



Employment Opportunities
Adirondack Lakes Survey Corporation, 1115 NYS Rt.86, P.O. BOX 296, Ray Brook, NY 12977
Voice: 518·897·1354  Fax: 518·897·1364
info@adirondacklakessurvey.org
These pages are copyright ©  by Adirondack Lakes Survey Corporation

Adobe® Reader® is required to view many documents on this website. Visit www.adobe.com to get the latest version.